www.mfat.govt.nz www.safetravel.govt.nz
New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs & Trade.
.Global IssuesDisarmamentEnvironmentHuman RightsChildrenCountry SituationsGeneralIndigenous PeoplesOther TopicsRacial and religiousReformTreatiesUniversal Periodic ReviewWomenInternational SecurityInternational OrganisationsAfricaAntarcticaAsiaAustraliaEuropeLatin AmericaMiddle EastNorth AmericaPacific

New Zealand presentation to the Committee on Elimination of Racial Discrimination

31 July 2007

 

New Zealand opening statement to the Committee

Ambassador Don MacKay, New Zealand Permanent Representative to the
United Nations, Geneva

Mr Chairman,

On behalf of the New Zealand Government, it is my pleasure to present New Zealand’s 15th, 16th and 17th consolidated report under the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination.

New Zealand takes very seriously the issues raised in our report and is committed to a constructive and substantive dialogue with the Committee. As a demonstration of this commitment, a very strong delegation has travelled to Geneva to engage with the Committee on a wide range of areas of responsibility and expertise. The delegation members are:


The breadth of expertise on the delegation responds to the Committee’s observations in 2002 that we should broaden the dialogue with the Committee, in particular that our presentation should give more attention to the enjoyment of rights by persons who identify with the broader range of ethnic minorities in New Zealand. We trust the Committee will take advantage of the broad representation on the delegation to have a wide ranging discussion on issues relevant to contemporary New Zealand in the context of the periodic report.

This is a large delegation for New Zealand and accordingly we hope to have the most substantial dialogue possible with the Committee, including on issues that may be sensitive and complex.

We are also pleased that the New Zealand Race Relations Commissioner, Mr Joris de Bres, is able to be present at this session and that he proposes to deliver a short intervention to the Committee as a representative of New Zealand’s national human rights institution, the Human Rights Commission. We would like to also acknowledge and welcome the presence here today of representatives from our civil society, including spokespersons for iwi and hapu that have submitted independent material to the Committee, all of whom have travelled a long way to observe the proceedings of this Committee.

Background

Throughout the period under review, the Government has continued to work to eliminate discrimination based on colour, religion, race or ethnic or national origin. New Zealand law specifically prohibits racial discrimination, and there continues to be a strong and active government commitment to the promotion of racial harmony.

Consistent with article 1, paragraph 4, of the Convention, successive Governments have held strongly that there must be equality of social and economic opportunity in New Zealand. Only thus can a fair society be sustained, free of any form of racial discrimination, and acknowledging diversity as a strength. The government-wide policy of reducing inequalities was a platform in the period under review for pursuing both social and economic initiatives in order to reduce disadvantage and promote equality of opportunity in New Zealand.

While the task of reducing inequalities continues, good progress has been made and is detailed in this report.

In New Zealand, like every other nation, there are isolated instances of racially motivated harassment. The perpetrators of such actions do not represent the vast majority of New Zealanders to whom racial discrimination is abhorrent. New Zealand has a strong history of confronting and resolving issues in race relations in a non-violent and constructive way. We seek constructive long-term engagement to provide lasting solutions. The New Zealand Government sees the open discussion of problems in race relations as a sign of a free and democratic society in which debate is encouraged and protest is a right.

In particular, the New Zealand Government welcomes debate on the place of the Treaty of Waitangi in the constitution. The recognition of equal rights for Māori, and special protection for Māori interests, on the one hand and the creation of a single legal system on the other are at the heart of the commitments exchanged under the Treaty of Waitangi of 1840. Accordingly, while Māori enjoy special recognition in many areas as a result of the Treaty of Waitangi, that special recognition is provided within the structure of the government and legal system as a whole.

New Zealand continues to monitor closely its performance in respect of key social indicators. Ethnic disparities in many areas are the subject of on-going concern and action. These include health, education and housing, as well as rates of offending and imprisonment. Information on such matters is readily accessible via government websites, and other publications, and openly debated in central and local government as well as wider civil society. The solutions for entrenched social problems often involve a range of different interventions by government, as well as communities themselves, and may take years to achieve tangible results.top of page

The report

The report covers the period from 1 January 2000 to 22 December 2005. Amongst other things, it addresses the issues raised by Committee during our last comprehensive dialogue in 2002.

This report, like New Zealand’s previous reports, sets the context in which issues of elimination, prevention and remedy in respect of all forms of racial discrimination are addressed. Inter alia, it describes efforts to improve the social, economic and cultural situation of Māori, including relevant developments in relation to the Treaty of Waitangi. It includes comment on the situation of Pacific peoples and other ethnic groups within New Zealand society. Quantitative information is also provided to help illustrate developments over the reporting period. Much of this information is based on statistics from the 2001 Census, although more recent statistics have been used when possible.

In addition, in response to the Committee’s request at its 66th session in February 2005, the report contains an update on the implementation of the Foreshore and Seabed Act. The Committee already has before it the submission and supporting material that New Zealand submitted to the Committee in 2005 regarding this Act, under its Early-Warning and Urgent Action Procedure.

The current periodic report should be read alongside New Zealand’s core document, the most updated version of which was circulated in October last year.

To assist the Committee further, we have also provided a comprehensive written response to the list of issues posed by the country rapporteur for New Zealand. We have also provided an update document on developments in New Zealand relevant to the Convention since December 2005.

We hope the additional material, which presents an up-to-date picture of the context in which today’s discussion takes place, will be useful to the Committee. It is consistent with the value we place on this opportunity to again engage in a constructive dialogue with the Committee.

I will shortly give the floor to members of the New Zealand delegation to individually comment with regard to the questions posed in the List of Issues that fall within their respective areas of expertise. Before doing so, I should like to make a few brief general comments and to highlight a number of positive developments since the presentation of our last report.

General context

New Zealand is a rapidly changing democratic society in the South Pacific. As the Committee knows, New Zealand is a unitary parliamentary democracy with a single national government and legal system. It is a multicultural nation where a significant number of people value their combined Māori and non-Māori ancestry.

The 2006 census results show that ethnic diversity in New Zealand is actually increasing:

European: 2,609,592 (67.6%)
Māori: 565,329 (14%)
Asian: 354,552 (9.2%)
Pacific: 265,974 (6.6%)

A further 11.1% described themselves simply as “New Zealander”, the first time that category has been recorded. The fastest growing group over the past five years was people who identified as Asian (which increased by almost 50%), followed by those who identified as Pacific (which grew by 14.7%) and those who identified as Māori (which grew by 7.4%).

The Core Document contains detailed information on the different age profiles of ethnic populations in New Zealand in respect of the statistics available at the time the report was submitted. It is important to be aware of these differences and, in particular, the relative youth of Māori and Pacific populations. These different age profiles are an important factor in explaining some of the differences in the many political and socio-economic statistics presented in this report. top of page

Positive Developments

There are many positive developments to note in the New Zealand report and updated material, some of which I would like to briefly highlight:

top of page

Concluding observations on 12th-14th reports, 2002

In its concluding observations of the presentation of New Zealand’s 12th-14th reports in 2002, the Committee recommended that our current report be an updating report and that it address the points raised in the 2002 concluding observations. For ease of reference, pages 5-7 of the current report indicate the relevant paragraphs that respond to the Committee’s earlier recommendations. I would like to highlight several of those:

Response to List of Issues

We will respond as best we can in the time available in this opening segment to the questions posed in the List of Issues. Given the time constraints, we will rely on the comprehensive written response and update document that you now have before you. Broadly, the delegation will respond to the questions in five segments over the next 45 minutes as follows:

Conclusion

Mr Chairman, we hope to have a broad ranging discussion touching upon all race relations issues relevant to contemporary New Zealand and, accordingly, we hope that Committee members will take this opportunity to pose questions taking into account the range of domestic agencies and areas of expertise represented here today on the New Zealand delegation.

back to Human Rights index

top of page

Page last updated: Thursday, 14 January 2010 11:33 NZDT