www.mfat.govt.nz www.safetravel.govt.nz
New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs & Trade.
.BlogsEventsFeaturesImage galleriesMediaPublicationsAnnual reportAsia White PaperBusinesslinkNewslettersPost Election BriefSOI 2013 16Statement of IntentTrade mattersUN Handbook

Current Annual Report

Previous Annual Reports

Download Acrobat          Reader

Annual Report 30 June 2012

Our outcomes

Outcome 1: New Zealand’s security and economic interests safeguarded through its political and security relationships

We need to maintain and develop a network of strong relationships that we can draw on in order to achieve the Government's priorities. The relationships the Ministry builds and sustains also support the work of other agencies, by facilitating access to decision makers who can assist them in achieving their objectives, particularly where these have an offshore component.

Progress towards outcome

Strengthening political, defence and security, trade and economic, and people-to-people links with Australia

Strong momentum was sustained in our close relationship with Australia, with a high level of political engagement supporting advances under the security and economic pillars.

Improving stability, security, governance, economic growth and sustainable development in Pacific island countries

New Zealand has been Chair of the Pacific Islands Forum in 2011/12. We have played an important coordinating role for the region and given profile to the Pacific's economic, development and security interests at international fora. This year saw frequent visits to and from New Zealand and regular high-level Ministerial contact with Pacific island countries.

Maximising opportunities in the bilateral relationship with the US to secure benefit for New Zealand and our region

The New Zealand/US relationship has moved ahead at a substantial pace following signature of the Wellington Declaration in 2010. The US now characterises its relationship with New Zealand as the best it has been in nearly 30 years, and identifies New Zealand as a valuable partner.

Positioning New Zealand to capitalise on economic growth and development in Asia

New Zealand continues to strongly advance the development of our political and trade links with Asia and opportunities for New Zealand in Asia. Growth in trade with Asia, in particular China and ASEAN, has been fundamental to the economic prosperity of New Zealand in 2011/12.

North Asia
South East Asia

Developing a more influential relationship with the European Union (EU)

top of page

 

Outcome 2: Economic growth and international competitiveness advanced through New Zealand's international connections

International connections underpin the Government's economic growth agenda. Through connections we are able to protect benefits that we have negotiated, support greater competitiveness and opportunities, and help gain trade access for New Zealand exporters. These are vital for improving economic growth and productivity and maintaining New Zealand's capacity to influence a rapidly changing world economy.

Progress towards outcome

World Trade Organization (WTO) Doha Round

New Zealand has worked to preserve outcomes negotiated to date, particularly by highlighting the need to avoid artificial deadlines for conclusion of the round. We have been an active and engaged contributor to services and trade facilitation. We have coordinated closely with like-minded developed and developing countries to promote compromise solutions on new guidelines for WTO accession of Least Developed Countries.

FTAs and other trade and economic frameworks

Minimising impact of trade access problems

The Ministry has provided expertise and support as required, especially through its network of Posts, for addressing bilateral and regional market access problems. In this work the Ministry coordinates closely with other NZ Inc agencies (notably Ministry for Primary Industries, Ministry for Economic Development, New Zealand Customs Service and NZTE) and has been in regular contact with industry stakeholders.

Improved economic growth and productivity in New Zealand through increased international linkages

The Ministry has supported a wide range of activities aimed at assisting other business agencies to promote export engagement, for example Export Credit Office changes, establishment of a new Crown entity Education New Zealand, and the double taxation review (with Inland Revenue and the Treasury). At an international level, the Ministry's engagement with the OECD on key issues such as services trade and global value chains is supporting improved understanding of international linkages.

The Ministry continued to lead cross-agency work on NZ Inc country and regional strategies, which strengthen strategic planning and operational coordination among agencies. In 2011/12 NZ Inc strategies have been launched and are being implemented for China and India, and NZ Inc agencies have worked on country strategies for the US and Australia, and regional strategies for the ASEAN and Gulf Cooperation Council regions. There has been extensive engagement with business in developing, testing and implementing the strategies. Information seminars on the China strategy took place in nine centres around New Zealand, with more than 650 people participating. The refreshed New Zealand Latin America Strategy, which Cabinet approved in 2009, continues to guide New Zealand's engagement for this substantial growth region.

The Ministry is coordinating the Building Export Markets workstream of the Government's Business Growth Agenda, which will help drive a more productive and competitive economy. Building Export Markets articulates a range of coordinated actions that the Government is undertaking to promote opportunities for New Zealand exporters and improve the operating environment for exporters both in New Zealand and in offshore markets.

New Zealand maintains a capacity to influence a rapidly changing world economy

The world economy has demonstrated significant volatility in the past year. In response to the changing times the Ministry has been positioning its network of assets and people to respond in a nimble way.

Throughout this change we have successfully maintained the capacity required to continue implementing our strategic policy objectives.

The Ministry continued to engage with relevant international economic organisations œ such as the OECD œ to help promote New Zealand's interests in international economic policy development.

Measuring progress towards economic outcomes
Progress towards achieving economic outcomes

Indicator

Sub-Indicator

2009/2010
(March Year)

2010/2011
(March Year)

2011/2012
(March Year)

NZ exports grow
as a percentage
of GDP1

  28.3% 29.7% 30.2%

Foreign direct investment as a proportion of GDP1

Inwards 49.4% 47.9% 48.1%
NZ performance on key indicators of international competitiveness improves Outwards 11.5% 11.7% 12.0%
KOF globalisation ranking 27 out of 208 25 out of 208 27 out of 208
World Economic Forum competitiveness ranking2 20 out of 144 23 out of 144 25 out of 142
World Economic Forum enabling trade ranking 11 out of 125 6 out of 125 5 out of 132

Percentage of merchandise trade covered by trade agreements

 

Share of total exports in 2011

Share of total exports in 2010

TRADE AGREEMENTS CURRENTLY IN FORCE
   

NZ-Australia CER (1 January 1983)

23.0 23.0

NZ-Singapore CEP (1 January 2001)

1.7 1.9

NZ-Thailand CEP (1 January 2005)

1.5 1.6

P4 (Singapore, 1 May 2005; Brunei,
12 July 2006); (Chile, 8 November 2006)3

0.1 0.1

NZ-China FTA (1 October 2008)

12.3 11.1

AANZFTA (1 January 2010)4

4.3 4.8

NZ-Malaysia FTA (1 August 2010)

1.8 1.8

NZ-Hong Kong CEP (1 January 2011)

1.7 2.0

Total exports covered
by agreements in force

46.6 46.3
PENDING FINALISATION
   

NZ-GCC FTA

3.2 2.9
UNDER NEGOTIATION
   
TPP (Australia, Brunei, Chile, Malaysia, Peru, Singapore, US, Viet Nam)5 8.6 8.8
NZ-Korea FTA 3.5 3.2
NZ- India FTA 2.0 2.1
NZ-Chinese Taipei –ECA6 1.9 -
NZ – Russia Belarus-Kazakhstan FTA 0.6 0.6
Total exports to be covered by agreements 66.4 64.0

The proportion of New Zealand merchandise exports entering FTA markets duty-free

Trade agreements currently in force

% of exports to FTA partner duty-free in 2011

% of exports to FTA partner duty-free in 20109

NZ-Australia CER (1 January 1983) 100 100
NZ-Singapore CEP (1 January 2001) 100 100
NZ-Thailand CEP (1 January 2005) 51.1 56.3
P4 (Singapore, 1 May 2005; Brunei,
12 July 2006); Chile (8 November 2006)7
   
Chile
85.8 85.8
NZ-China FTA (1 October 2008) 37.5 37.7
AANZFTA (1 January 2010)8    
Indonesia
49.9 49.6
Philippines
78.1 73.6
NZ-Malaysia FTA (1 August 2010) 94.9 93.2
NZ-Hong Kong CEP (1 January 2011) 100 100

Approximately 36 percent of total New Zealand merchandise exports entered duty-free into the various FTA markets. In addition, FTAs have secured favourable trading conditions for New Zealand investors and services exporters in key sectors, including a range of professional and business services.

top of page

 

Outcome 3: New Zealand's interests secured through regional and multilateral engagement and effective international rules

New Zealand's ongoing prosperity depends on the prosperity and security of the markets we trade with. It also depends on the willingness of other countries to respect international rules, many of which are set by the UN and related organisations. Where common resources are concerned, internationally agreed rules are often required to avoid over-exploitation. As a small country, New Zealand has an interest in a rule-setting system that is effective and gives us a voice.

Progress towards outcome

Enhanced security through more effective responses to international and regional security challenges

New Zealand promotes rules-based approaches to international security, and more effective functioning of regional and international security institutions. New Zealand also participates in targeted interventions offshore, to address the security challenges related to fragile and failing states, and is actively engaged in efforts against threats to national and international security such as terrorism, illegal migration and proliferation of WMD and conventional weapons.

Peace support deployments
Counter-terrorism
People smuggling
Nuclear security
Non-proliferation
Conventional weapons

Progress in advancing an international environmental and natural resource agenda that advances New Zealand interests and supports New Zealand economic competitiveness

A more effective and accountable UN that is more responsive to New Zealand's interests

A relevant and more effective Commonwealth that advances respect for the rule of law

top of page

 

Outcome 4: Sustainable development in developing countries in order to reduce poverty and contribute to a more secure equitable and prosperous world.

Good development outcomes in the Pacific and elsewhere are critical elements of New Zealand's foreign policy objectives.

The Ministry's International Development Policy Statement: Supporting Sustainable Development' was published in March 2011 and sets out the approach the New Zealand Government follows in managing and delivering development assistance. It identifies four themes: investing in economic development, promoting human development, improving resilience and responding to disasters, and building safe and secure communities. The policy statement identifies sustainable economic development and the Pacific as priorities, and sets out a targeted approach for other regions.

Progress towards outcome

During 2011/12 the amount of development assistance spent on sustainable economic development activities increased by 40 percent (from $100 million to $140 million). The percentage of support going to the Pacific increased from 52 percent to 56 percent (from $257.3 million to $287 millionv), and the median annual expenditure on activities increased from $200,000 to $255,519. Ten Joint Commitments for Development and programme strategies have been agreed with bilateral partner countries. These are positive results in line with Government policy directions and the new business model. (For details of development results resulting from New Zealand's development assistance, refer to section six of this report.)

Economic Indicators

High level indicators of economic change form a starting point for tracking progress towards the development outcomes that New Zealand seeks to support. Results are largely attributable to the performance of the countries themselves with donor support supplementing their efforts, which makes direct attribution difficult.

The key bilateral partners of the New Zealand Aid Programme are shown below, with basic statistics including the amount of aid they have received from New Zealand and other donors.

Bilateral partner countries: basic statistics

 

New Zealand Aid (NZ $M)

Bilateral Partners

Population (M)10

GNI per capita 2010, Atlas Method (US$)11

Total aid from all donors 2010
(US$ M)12

Net ODA as a percentage of GNI 2010
(US$ M)13

2009/10

2010/11

2011/12

Cook Islands

0.03 n.a 13 n.a 7.7 18.9 19.4

Niue

n.a n.a 15 n.a 11.2 23.7 16.2

Tokelau

n.a n.a 15 n.a 14.6 20.5 23.3

Samoa

0.19 2,980 147 25.5 21.8 18.5 20.4

Tonga

0.1 3,290 70 19.5 13.0 14.6 25.5

Tuvalu

0.01 4,760 13 26.2 2.8 1.8 7.4

Papua New Guinea

7.06 1,300 513 5.5 25.1 31.4 27.6

Solomon Islands

0.54 1,030 340 61.4 41.1 33.4 33.6

Vanuatu

0.24 2,640 108 16.2 21.0 16.7 18.2

Kiribati

0.11 2,000 23 10.5 6.0 8.9 22.0

Fiji

0.85 3,630 76 2.5 5.8 4.5 6.6

Indonesia

241.37 2,500 1,393 0.2 10.2 16.4 19.5

Viet Nam

87.84 1,160 2,945 2.9 12.7 9.0 9.3

Timor-Leste

1.09 2,220 292 9.2 7.8 9.4 9.9

Cambodia

14.52 750 737 6.9 5.9 4.6 4.6

Philippines

94.09 2,060 535 0.3 5.2 5.9 4.6

Lao PDR

6.38 1,040 416 6.2 2.6 3.7 6.9

n.a = data not available

Economic growth

Economic growth forecast in the Pacific region accelerated from 2.9 percent in 2011 to 3.6 percent in 2012vi. The major contributors to this performance were Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands and Timor-Leste, with economic growth rates of more than 6.0 percent. In the Cook Islands, Tuvalu and Kiribati projected economic growth rates improved at least 1.4 percent from 2010/11. The 2012 projected growth rate of 6.95 percent in the Asian region has moderated and remained stable since 2010/11 due to weaker external demand and tightened monetary policies to battle inflation.

Ease of doing business

Ease of doing business is a key indicator provided by the World Bank. Three of the 13 New Zealand partner countries measured have improved their regulatory environments for starting and operating local firms. Compared to last year, Tonga, Solomon Islands and Timor-Leste have shown an improvement in their rankingsvii. Other partner countries have stayed the same or shown a slight reduction in their rankings.

Progress in Sustainable Development

 

Ease of doing business ranking (low numbers better)15

 

Programme

Forecast growth rate of GDP 2012

Current account balance 2011
(% of GDP)14

2011

2012

Human development index (HDI) values 201116

Cook Islands 5.4 4 n.a n.a n.a
Samoa 2.5 -9.3 55 60 0.688
Tonga 0.4 -11 62 58 0.704
Tuvalu 1.4 n.a n.a n.a n.a
Papua New Guinea 7.5 -36.8 97 101 0.466
Solomon Islands 6 -11.2 81 74 0.51
Vanuatu 4.5 -5.9 75 76 0.617
Kiribati 3.5 -28.9 111 115 0.624
Fiji 1 -11.2 72 77 0.688
Indonesia 6.5 0.2 126 129 0.617
Vietnam 6.3 0.2 90 98 0.593
Timor-Leste 10 339.4 169 168 0.495
Cambodia 6.5 -7.1 138 138 0.523
Philippines 4.8 3.1 134 136 0.644
Lao PDR 7.6 -15.9 163 165 0.524

n.a = data not available

Dependence on Official Development Assistance

The majority of Asian developing countries have made progress towards a reduction in dependence on development assistance as a proportion of their GNI compared to last yearviii. In contrast four from eight of our Pacific partner countries (with data available) appear to have increased dependence, especially Samoa and Solomon Islands. (This may reflect increased assistance following the 2009 tsunami in Samoa and an increase in Australian support for Solomon Islands).

Human Development Index (HDI)

HDI is a comparative measure of life expectancy, literacy, education, and standards of living of a country. HDI values in New Zealand's bilateral partner countries slightly improved over the past yearix.

Millennium Development Goals (MDGs)

In the Pacific, the overall trend is that Polynesian countries are performing relatively well and are on track to achieve four of the MDGs: universal primary education, reducing child mortality, improving maternal health, and ensuring environmental sustainabilityx. The Cook Islands and Niue are on track for six out of seven MDGs and Tonga is on track for five. In contrast, Melanesian countries and Kiribati are not making much progress. Papua New Guinea is the most off track and its large population of approximately 7 million tends to skew the statistics for the Pacific.

In Asia, most countries are on target to eradicate extreme poverty and hunger - all have reduced the percentage of population living below the international poverty line (US$1.25 per day)xi. There has been less consistency in achieving universal primary education, with the Philippines, Timor-Leste, Lao and Cambodia not on track to meet the MDG education targets. No Asian country is on track to meet all seven MDGs, although Viet Nam is on track to meet six, and Timor-Leste has shown significant gains and is now on track to meet at least four. The Philippines is not on track to meet any of the MDGs.

Improving how we manage development assistance and measure our impact

Programme performance

Throughout 2011/12 the Ministry has been developing new development programme management policy, planning and results frameworks that will better define what official development assistance (ODA) New Zealand will contribute to a particular programme and how New Zealand can support the best outcomes. New Zealand's specific contribution towards development outcomes for each country programme are outlined in Joint Commitments for Development (for Pacific countries) and programme strategies.

Efforts to reduce fragmentation and improve aid effectiveness have seen the number of programmes reduce from 33 to 24 in 2011/12. Each programme completes an annual plan and progress report including a rating of progress towards the development outcomes set out in programme strategies. For 2011/12, out of a total of 130 strategic objectives, 70 percent were rated good or better, and 97 percent were rated as adequate or better (see section six).

Programme ratings

Drawn from 26 reports

Excellent

Good

Adequate

Unsatisfactory

Total

2011/12

Number objectives

17

74

35

4

130

%

13%

57%

27%

3%

100%

2010/11

Number objectives

18

70

32

6

126

%

14%

56%

25%

5%

100%

During 2011/12 a multi-year strategic evaluation programme was developed in order to contribute to both accountability and learning. Key strategic evaluations currently underway include sector evaluations of our work in policing and Pacific fisheries.

Programme spend

Programme

2009/10 $M

2010/11 $M

2011/12 $M

Cook Islands

7.4

18.8

19.0

Niue

11.2

23.7

16.2

Tokelau

14.6

20.5

23.3

Fiji

4.8

4.4

3.2

Kiribati

5.9

8.8

21.4

Papua New Guinea

24.7

28.1

23.7

Samoa

20.4

17.9

18.8

Solomon Islands

40.7

32.7

32.6

Tonga

12.7

14.2

25.1

Tuvalu

2.8

1.7

6.9

Vanuatu

20.7

16.3

16.5

Pacific Economic Development

17.6

14.8

15.6

Pacific Human Development

15.4

19.3

20.2

Pacific Regional Agencies

15.8

20.7

20.3

Afghanistan

5.1

7.8

7.1

Indonesia

8.6

13.6

18.8

Timor-Leste

7.4

8.5

9.8

Viet Nam

12.6

7.9

9.3

Asia/ASEAN Regional

20.8

21.9

24.8

Africa Regional

7.9

6.0

3.9

Latin America Regional

5.6

4.7

2.3

Partnerships

41.5

32.3

31.0

Humanitarian

9.0

16.8

20.1

Multilateral

93.1

123.8

114.1

Other Non-programme

9.0

9.9

6.4

Grand Total

435.3

495.1

510.4

Activity performance

In 2011/12 Activity Management Operational Guidance was released, covering a suite of activity cycle management and contracting policies, guidelines, templates and business tools for managing development assistance. New mandatory Activity Results Frameworks focus on identifying results (outputs and outcomes) that are directly due to New Zealand's contribution and on developing strong integrated monitoring and evaluation systems at the start of the activity life cycle. Activity Monitoring Assessments and Activity Completion Assessments monitor our activities and track progress against results. They provide measures of relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, likely impact and sustainability of benefits.

Efforts to reduce the number of activities being managed and ensure increased number of larger and higher impact activities have been successful. In 2011/12 there were a total of 597 activities, compared to 718 activities in 2010/11. (For details on selected activities from the Pacific and Global Appropriations refer to section six.)

Working with others

New Zealand works in partnerships with third parties to deliver ODA. This enables us to draw on the expertise, knowledge and experience of a variety of different organisations throughout New Zealand and abroad. It is also a way to support greater coherence and harmonisation of aid within a region or sector and enables New Zealand to contribute towards larger scale resourcing needed to address significant challenges.

Multilateral organisations

In 2011/12, $145.4 millionxii or 28 percent of the New Zealand Aid Programme was delivered through multilateral organisations, including humanitarian agencies. The largest multilateral recipients are the Asian Development Bank, United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), the World Bank, and the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF).

New Zealand non-government organisations (NGOs)

In 2011/12, the Ministry committed $23 million to NGOs for multi-year projects through the Sustainable Development Fund (SDF). The SDF will be replaced in 2012/13 by the New Zealand Partnerships for International Development Fund that will provide contestable support to New Zealand NGO, state and private sector organisations to deliver development results offshore. (For additional details on selected activities in the International Agency and Voluntary Agency Grants, refer to section six.)

top of page

 

Outcome 5: The rights of New Zealanders protected abroad.

The Ministry is responsible for assisting New Zealanders in distress overseas, including in the event of a natural disaster or other large-scale emergency. The Ministry also seeks to mitigate risks to New Zealanders by raising the awareness of New Zealanders travelling and living overseas.

The Ministry's consular emergency response capacity would also be activated in the event of a major natural disaster in New Zealand in order to facilitate international assistance and liaise with foreign missions.

Progress towards outcome

Raising the awareness of New Zealanders travelling and living overseas

We receive consistently positive feedback on our service performance in our surveys of recipients of consular services. Preliminary indications of this year's survey indicate a very high 82 percent client satisfaction rate and an increased awareness of the safe travel website (up by 10 percent).

Consular emergency responses

There have been no large emergency response events this year. Assistance was, however, provided to a handful of New Zealanders evacuating from civil unrest situations in Syria, Mali, Guinea Bissau and Thailand floods in October.

top of page

 

Footnotes

[i] This is the total number of short-term visitors whose country of last permanent residence was the Cook Islands, Fiji, French Polynesia, New Caledonia, Samoa or Tonga.

[ii] This is the number high level inwards and outwards visits serviced by the Ministry for the Asia region.

[iii] This includes visitors whose place of last permanent residence included the People's Republic of China, Hong Kong (SAR), India, Indonesia, Japan, the Republic of Korea, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Taiwan and Thailand.

[iv] This is the total number of visitors whose country/place of last permanent residence included: Austria, Denmark, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom.

[v] This figure includes the Pacific appropriation, plus projects in the Pacific funded through the Sustainable Development Fund (New Zealand AgenciesƒAppropriation).

[vi] ADB, Asia Economic Monitor, December 2011 and the ADB Pacific Economic Monitor, March 2012.

[vii] Ease of Doing Business Ranking 2012: World Banking Group: Doing Business 2012.

[viii] Net ODA as a percent of GNI 2010, World Bank: World Development indicators http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/DT.ODA.ODAT.GN.ZS

[ix] Human Development Indicators (HDI) values, UNDP 2011.

[x] 2011 Pacific Regional MDGs Tracking Report.

[xi] 2011 ADB Key indicators for Asia and the Pacific.

[xii] This figure includes the International Agency Appropriations, plus other bilateral, regional and humanitarian funding channelled through multilateral agencies.

[1] Figures quoted for 2009/10 and 2010/11 are different to those used in the MFAT Annual Report 2010/11 due to a revision of GDP figures covering several financial years preceding.

[2] The lower the ranking the better the performance.

[3] Only reports the additional contribution made by new FTA partners.

[4] Only reports the additional contribution made by new FTA partners and also excludes Malaysia given the separate New Zealand-Malaysia FTA.

[5] Only reports the additional contribution made by new FTA partners. Note the table does not include Mexico and Canada, although they are expected to join TPP negotiations later in 2012.

[6] Negotiated by the New Zealand Commerce and Industry Office in Taipei and the Taipei Economic and Cultural Office in Wellington.

[7] Only reports the additional contribution made by new FTA partners.

[8] Only reports the additional contribution made by new FTA partners and also excludes Malaysia given the separate New Zealand-Malaysia FTA. Figures for Viet Nam, Brunei, Cambodia, Laos, and Myanmar are not available.

[9] Note the figures reported here for 2010 differ from those reported in the 2010/11 Annual Report. The 2010/11 Annual Report was based on projections from the National Impact Assessments of the respective FTAs, whereas all figures presented here reflect actual trade flows.

[10] ADB Basic Statistics 2012.

[11] ADB Basic Statistics 2012.

[12] OECD Aid Statistics, Recipient Charts (last updated Jan 2012).

[13] World Bank: World Development Indicators (accessed July 2012).

[14] ADB Basic Statistics 2012.

[15] Ease of Doing Business Ranking 2012: World Banking Group: Doing Business in a more transparent world 2012. Figures quoted for 2011 are different to those used in the MFAT Annual Report 2010/11 due to a revision of the previous years 'Ease of doing business ranking' figures.

[16] Human Development Index 2011: UNDP.

top of page

Back to Annual report index

Our organisational health and capability >
< Organisational information