www.mfat.govt.nz www.safetravel.govt.nz
New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs & Trade.
.Market accessTrade Relationships and AgreementsExport controlsNZ Inc Country and Regional StrategiesAPECEASNZ and the WTODohaImproving access to marketsStrengthening trade rulesTrade IssuesOECDTrade and economic analysisTrade lawTrade scholarships

Related resources

Document archive

Papers Submitted to the World Trade Organisation on Fisheries Subsidies
Country/territory locator

Enter the country or territory for the information paper you want. (We do not have information papers on all countries.)

World map. Africa Europe Middle East North Asia South/South East Asia Australia Pacific Latin America North America/Caribbean

 

Glossary

Although we have tried to use plain English content on the site, you may come across specialist terms and acronyms. Find out what they mean in our glossary of terms.

If you come across a term that isn't included in the Glossary please send us an email.

New Zealand and the World Trade Organisation

Fisheries Subsidies - Framework for Disciplines

New Disciplines on Fisheries Subsidies: Proposed Amendments to the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures

World Trade Organisation - Negotiating Group on Rules

WTO document number - TN/RL/GEN/100 - 3 March 2006

Paper from New Zealand

The following communication, dated 2 March 2006, is being circulated at the request of the Delegation of New Zealand.

The submitting delegation has requested that this paper, which was submitted to the Rules Negotiating Group as an informal document (JOB(06)/38), also be circulated as a formal document.

New Zealand submits the attached paper as a contribution to the fisheries subsidies negotiations, in keeping with the timeline foreshadowed by the Director-General in JOB (06)/13 for proposals by March in the form of legal drafting.

This contribution to the fisheries subsidies negotiations builds on previous submissions. In particular, New Zealand’s paper in April 2004, TN/RL/W/154, called for a broad prohibition on fisheries subsidies while recognizing the need for balance with exceptions, transitional provisions and special and differential treatment for developing countries. A further paper put forward in November 2004, TN/RL/W/166, discussed key principles in designing an approach to a broad prohibition on fisheries subsidies disciplines: simplicity and enforceability; transparency; and flexibility.

New Zealand looks forward to discussing this proposal with other interested delegations, and would expect to further refine and expand on this proposal in light of this debate.

New Disciplines on Fisheries Subsidies: Proposed Amendments to the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures

Article 3 bis

Prohibited Fisheries Subsidies

Except as provided for in Article 27 bis and Annex VIII of this Agreement, subsidies[1] within the meaning of Article 1 of this Agreement that confer a benefit[2] directly or indirectly on any natural or legal person engaged in the harvesting, processing, transport, marketing or sale of the fish and fisheries products listed in Annex IX of this Agreement (“fisheries subsidies”) shall be prohibited.

Article 25 bis

Enhanced Notification Requirements for Fisheries Subsidies

[Procedures for notification requirements for non-prohibited (Annex VIII) fisheries subsidies will be developed.]

Article 27 bis

Special & Differential Treatment for Fisheries Subsidies

The prohibition of Article 3 bis shall not apply to fisheries subsidies provided by a developing country Member where such subsidies do not exceed the de minimis level for that Member.

[To be elaborated, including the possibility of further flexibilities for LDCs.]

Article 28 bis

Existing Fisheries Subsidies Programmes

Fisheries subsidies which have been established within the territory of any Member before the date on which Article 3 bis comes into force and which are inconsistent with that Article shall be:

  1. notified to the Committee no later than one year after the date that Article 3 bis comes into force; and
  2. brought into conformity with Article 3 bis within three years of the date that Article 3 bis comes into force and until then shall not be subject to Part II.

top of page

Annex VIII

Exhaustive List of Non-Prohibited Fisheries Subsidies

Provided that they are notified in accordance with Article 25 bis, nothing in Article 3 bis shall prevent the adoption of the following fisheries subsidies:

  1. subsidies to aquaculture activities provided that …[conditions to be specified to ensure any adverse impacts on wild capture fisheries are addressed];
  2. subsidies for vessel decommissioning and licence retirement provided that …[conditions to be specified to ensure permanent removal of capacity];
  3. subsidies to research to inform fisheries management decision makers, including data collection, surveys, data analysis and stock assessment;
  4. subsidies for conservation-related activities [to be elaborated];
  5. access payments [further conditions to be further elaborated, including consideration of additional transparency requirements for the subsidising Member]
  6. certain infrastructure (e.g. the provision of transport infrastructure for fishing communities);
  7. certain social insurance programmes (e.g. worker retraining programmes); and
  8. natural disaster relief [to the extent that it only restores the fishery to its pre-disaster state]

Government expenditures directly associated with the creation and implementation of fisheries management systems[3], and the enforcement of fisheries management rules shall not be treated as fisheries subsidies for the purposes of this Agreement.

ANNEX IX

Product Coverage for Fisheries Subsidies

The fish and fisheries products referred to in Article 3 bis and related Articles refer to:

[1] We note that Article 1.2 of the ASCM provides that a subsidy shall be subject to the provisions of Part II only if such a subsidy is specific in accordance with the provisions of Article 2. New Zealand continues to be concerned that some generally available (non-specific) subsidies could directly contribute to overcapacity and overfishing, for example a generally available fuel subsidy. We look forward to discussing textual options for addressing this concern.

[2] The term benefit is used here in the sense of Article 1.1(b) of this Agreement.

[3] This comprises the establishment and administration of management systems (including allocating and monitoring fishing licences, permits, quota, vessel numbers and catch returns); adjusting management settings within an existing management system; and developing amendments or additions to the existing management system.

top of page

Back to the Fisheries Subsidies Negotiations

Page last updated: Tuesday, 12 October 2010 12:40 NZDT